View price in:  
Home> Hookah Charcoal
Three Kings Rings Charcoal Roll 44mm
Three Kings Rings Charcoal Roll 44mm
click to see larger image
Name: Three Kings Rings Charcoal Roll 44mm
Your Price:
$2.45
Serial Number: IK-669-ROLL
Stock Status: In Stock

Hookah Charcoal Description

The Three Kings Charcoal is considered to be the original quicklighting Hookah Charcoal Brand on the market. Three Kings proudly introduces their version of the ring shaped charcoal with this new brand of Three Kings Rings Charcoal.

Ring Hookah Coals offer many advantages over other traditional quick light hookah coals:

- The Ring Coal design allows for air flow through the coal, keeping the coal lit throughout the entire smoking session.

- Ring Shaped Hookah Coals offer more surface area, allowing for more efficient combustion.

- Ring Coals burn slightly warmer than most other quick lighting hookah coals on the market, allowing less charcoal per session. Ring Coals also complement the Vortex and Phunnel Bowls very well, as they do not offer direct heat over the center spire.

These Charcoals Rings are manufactured in Holland, and are specifically designed for smoking with the Hookah. The Three Kings Rings Charcoals are known for their quality since they are odorless, as well as tasteless and do not interfere with flavor of the tobacco.

Each roll of Three Kings Rings Charcoal contains ten individual charcoals.

It is recommended that three rolls of Charcoals be purchased for every 250g Box of Flavored Tobacco.

Blog.SouthSmoke.com - Three Kings Charcoal Review | Why We Love 3 Kings Hookah Charcoal

Size:
trans.gif
   

Customer Reviews(2)

Alright
There alright just don't like the quick lights that much
Review by William G
Posted 21 Mar 2017
Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No
35 out of 59 people found the following review helpful
 
generally good
I once tried to change the charcoal I regularly use (Carbopol/RING) and bought this one. Well, it?s not bad but I felt a slight smell. In general these are more or less similar but Carbopol lasted more and smelled less.
Review by Valerie Fabius
Posted 31 May 2016
Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No
57 out of 104 people found the following review helpful